linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.39-rc4+: oom-killer busy killing tasks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.01.1104212000420.18728@trent.utfs.org>
Date:	Thu, 21 Apr 2011 20:03:27 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Christian Kujau <lists@...dbynature.de>
To:	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, xfs@....sgi.com
Subject: Re: 2.6.39-rc4+: oom-killer busy killing tasks

On Fri, 22 Apr 2011 at 11:58, Minchan Kim wrote:
> But I wonder why VM can't reclaim the pages. As I see the log, there
> are lots of slab pages(710M) in DMA zone while LRU pages are very
> small. SLAB pages are things VM has a trouble to reclaim. I am not
> sure 710M of SLAB is reasonable size. Don't you have experience same
> problem in old kernel?

No, I forgot to add 2.6.38 (and before) did not show that behaviour.

> If you see the problem first in 2.6.39-rc4, maybe it would be a
> regression(ex, might be slab memory leak)

I would think so. I'll try to bisect, but with one compilation taking 
~20min on this box, this might take a while.

> Could you get the information about slabinfo(ex, cat /proc/slabinfo)
> right before OOM happens.

When it happens again, I'll try to get this.

Thanks for replying,
Christian.
-- 
BOFH excuse #73:

Daemons did it
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/