[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110423181231.GA1472@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2011 20:12:31 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Nikita V. Youshchenko" <nyoushchenko@...sta.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] x86: signal: sys_rt_sigreturn() should use
set_current_blocked()
On 04/22, Matt Fleming wrote:
>
> On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 15:46:41 +0200
> Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> > Normally sys_rt_sigreturn() restores the old current->blocked which was
> > changed by handle_signal(), and unblocking is always fine.
> >
> > But the debugger or application itself can change frame->uc_sigmask and
> > thus we need set_current_blocked()->retarget_shared_pending().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...ux.intel.com>
Thanks Matt.
> But does sys_sigreturn() also need this change?
Of course, it needs. From 0/7:
Once again: if we need this, then we need a lot more (trivial) changes
like 6/7 and 7/7. Basically every change of ->blocked should be converted
to use set_current_blocked().
6 and 7 are simple examples, most of the other changes will look similary.
Except sys_rt_sigtimedwait(), it changes both ->real_blocked and blocked,
see the patches I sent. sys_sigprocmask() is a bit annoying, but the
necessary changes are simple.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists