linux-kernel - Re: [patch] m68k, mm: set all online nodes in N_NORMAL

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4DB3AF8B.6020105@gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 24 Apr 2011 17:05:15 +1200
From:	Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@...glemail.com>
To:	Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@...glemail.com>
CC:	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>,
	linux-m68k@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	schwab@...ux-m68k.org,
	"tg@...bsd.de >> Thorsten Glaser" <tg@...bsd.de>
Subject: Re: [patch] m68k, mm: set all online nodes in N_NORMAL_MEMORY

Michael Schmitz wrote:
> Besides, your solution would set N_HIGH_MEMORY not N_NORMAL_MEMORY if 
> I read free_area_init_nodes() right. Does that matter?
check_for_regular_memory() does take care of that - so it would be all 
the same in the end. Whether it's worth it for a handful of nodes at 
best I'm unsure. I'll leave that for Geert to decide.

Cheers,

  Michael

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/