[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1104240306570.28014@swampdragon.chaosbits.net>
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2011 03:08:42 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>
To: james_p_freyensee@...ux.intel.com
cc: gregkh@...e.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
suhail.ahmed@...el.com, christophe.guerard@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] Intel PTI implementaiton of MIPI 1149.7.
On Sun, 24 Apr 2011, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Apr 2011, james_p_freyensee@...ux.intel.com wrote:
>
...
> > +static void pti_tty_cleanup(struct tty_struct *tty)
> > +{
> > + struct pti_tty *pti_tty_data;
> > + struct pti_masterchannel *mc;
> > +
> > + pti_tty_data = tty->driver_data;
> > +
> > + if (pti_tty_data != NULL) {
> > + mc = pti_tty_data->mc;
> > + pti_release_masterchannel(mc);
> > + pti_tty_data->mc = NULL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (pti_tty_data != NULL)
> > + kfree(pti_tty_data);
> > +
> > + tty->driver_data = NULL;
> > +}
>
> How about this instead?
>
> static void pti_tty_cleanup(struct tty_struct *tty)
> {
> if (!tty->driver_data)
> return;
> pti_release_masterchannel(tty->driver_data->mc);
> kfree(tty->driver_data);
> }
>
I meant to say :
static void pti_tty_cleanup(struct tty_struct *tty)
{
if (!tty->driver_data)
return;
pti_release_masterchannel(tty->driver_data->mc);
kfree(tty->driver_data);
tty->driver_data = NULL
}
--
Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net> http://www.chaosbits.net/
Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists