linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] signal: sigprocmask() should do retarget_shared

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110425111447.GH17734@mtj.dyndns.org>
Date:	Mon, 25 Apr 2011 13:14:47 +0200
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Nikita V. Youshchenko" <nyoushchenko@...sta.com>,
	Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] signal: sigprocmask() should do
 retarget_shared_pending()

Hey, again.

> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>

Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>

But, I really think we can use some comments around here.  Things
might look obvious now but it isn't very intuitive piece of code.

> +void set_current_blocked(const sigset_t *newset)
> +{
> +	struct task_struct *tsk = current;
> +
> +	spin_lock_irq(&tsk->sighand->siglock);
> +	if (signal_pending(tsk) && !thread_group_empty(tsk)) {
> +		sigset_t newblocked;
> +		signandsets(&newblocked, newset, &current->blocked);

While you're touching code around here, can you please rename
signandsets() to sigandnsets()?  It ain't nand!!!

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/