[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110425112130.GJ17734@mtj.dyndns.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 13:21:30 +0200
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Nikita V. Youshchenko" <nyoushchenko@...sta.com>,
Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] x86: signal: sys_rt_sigreturn() should use
set_current_blocked()
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 03:46:41PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> Normally sys_rt_sigreturn() restores the old current->blocked which was
> changed by handle_signal(), and unblocking is always fine.
>
> But the debugger or application itself can change frame->uc_sigmask and
> thus we need set_current_blocked()->retarget_shared_pending().
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
> arch/x86/kernel/signal.c | 5 +----
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> --- sigprocmask/arch/x86/kernel/signal.c~7_sigreturn 2011-04-17 23:07:14.000000000 +0200
> +++ sigprocmask/arch/x86/kernel/signal.c 2011-04-17 23:19:13.000000000 +0200
> @@ -601,10 +601,7 @@ long sys_rt_sigreturn(struct pt_regs *re
> goto badframe;
>
> sigdelsetmask(&set, ~_BLOCKABLE);
> - spin_lock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock);
> - current->blocked = set;
> - recalc_sigpending();
> - spin_unlock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock);
> + set_current_blocked(&set);
Comment!
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists