linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] Documentation: Correct a couple missing words in inotify.txt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20110424175318.9e0763cd.rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Date:	Sun, 24 Apr 2011 17:53:18 -0700
From:	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
To:	Aaron Faanes <dafrito@...il.com>
Cc:	John McCutchan <john@...nmccutchan.com>,
	Robert Love <rlove@...ve.org>,
	Eric Paris <eparis@...isplace.org>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Documentation: Correct a couple missing words in
 inotify.txt

On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 19:35:03 -0500 Aaron Faanes wrote:

> Signed-off-by: Aaron Faanes <dafrito@...il.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/filesystems/inotify.txt |    4 ++--
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/inotify.txt b/Documentation/filesystems/inotify.txt
> index f00c435..8d8cba1 100644
> --- a/Documentation/filesystems/inotify.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/inotify.txt
> @@ -248,9 +248,9 @@ A: An fd-per-watch quickly consumes more file descriptors than are allowed,
>  
>     When you talk about designing a file change notification system that
>     scales to 1000s of directories, juggling 1000s of fd's just does not seem
> -   the right interface.  It is too heavy.
> +   to be the right interface.  It is too heavy.

either way is OK.

>  
> -   Additionally, it _is_ possible to more than one instance and
> +   Additionally, it _is_ possible to have more than one instance and

OK, there is the missing word.

>     juggle more than one queue and thus more than one associated fd.  There
>     need not be a one-fd-per-process mapping; it is one-fd-per-queue and a
>     process can easily want more than one queue.
> -- 


---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/