[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4DB56B11.5090505@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 06:37:37 -0600
From: Eric Blake <eblake@...hat.com>
To: Jamie Lokier <jamie@...reable.org>
CC: Sunil Mushran <sunil.mushran@...cle.com>,
Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] fs: add SEEK_HOLE and SEEK_DATA flags
On 04/24/2011 11:49 AM, Jamie Lokier wrote:
>> My problem with FIND_* is that we are messing with the well understood
>> semantics of lseek().
>
> fcntl() looks a better fit for FIND_HOLE/DATA anyway.
With fcntl(), it would have to be something like:
off_t offset = start;
if (fcntl (fd, F_FIND_HOLE, &offset) != 0)
; // find failed
// offset is now set to the next location after start
That is, offset has to be passed as an input _and_ output parameter,
since we can't use the int return value of fcntl to convey off_t
information, and since the optional third argument of fcntl has
traditionally been no wider than a pointer which is not the case for
off_t on 32-bit platforms.
--
Eric Blake eblake@...hat.com +1-801-349-2682
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (620 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists