[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110425153316.GB14934@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 17:33:16 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Nikita V. Youshchenko" <nyoushchenko@...sta.com>,
Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] signal: introduce do_sigtimedwait() to factor out
compat/native code
On 04/25, Tejun Heo wrote:
>
> Just one more thing.
>
> On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 07:59:40PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > +int do_sigtimedwait(sigset_t *these, siginfo_t *info, long timeout)
>
> Maybe @these isn't the base name here? It implies that these are the
> signals the function is interested in but in reality it is the
> negation of that.
Yees, I simply copied the old name. And yes, I tried to invent the
better name but failed.
Hmm. I think this patch can do a bit more. We can factor out
sigdelsetmask(SIGKILL | SIGSTOP) + signotset() as well, I'll resend.
Still, what should be the name? @set? @mask? @which?
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists