[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110425170200.GA18363@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 19:02:00 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Nikita V. Youshchenko" <nyoushchenko@...sta.com>,
Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] signal: retarget_shared_pending: consider
shared/unblocked signals only
On 04/25, Tejun Heo wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 05:20:40PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > This series is already in -mm, I'd like to avoid another resend. So I'll
> > send another patch which addresses your comments on top of this series.
> >
> > OK?
>
> Why not route through the signal/ptrace tree?
I did these changes against the Linus's tree to simplify the review, and
because there are completely orthogonal to ptrace changes. Also, I like
very much the fact -mm has users/testers.
In fact, there are trivial conflicts with the ptrace branch. I think
ptrace should be flushed first, so I'll rebase this "sigprocmask" branch
when I address all comments.
Or do you think I should merge these changes into ptrace branch? I'd like
to keep them separate, but I am not sure if I should...
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists