[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 14:41:35 +1200
From: Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@...glemail.com>
To: Thorsten Glaser <tg@...bsd.de>
CC: Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@...glemail.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>,
linux-m68k@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
schwab@...ux-m68k.org
Subject: Re: [patch] m68k, mm: set all online nodes in N_NORMAL_MEMORY
Hello Thorsten,
>> Tested on my ARAnyM test setup so far. I'd like to wait for an independent
>> kernel image built by Thorsten before I test on the actual hardware. Sorry but
>> you'll have to restart your build Thorsten :-)
>>
>
> Heh okay, if you want. But only cross-compiling :D
>
Thought so. That's fine actually. Your cross toolchain will be a lot
more recent than mine.
>
> KOSAKI Motohiro dixit:
>
>
>> I think you are right. however I doubt m68k need to care memoryless node check.
>> probably following patch just work.
>>
>
> That’s what we have now. Compiles, boots, works fine.
>
>
> So, which of these do you guys want?
>
Whatever is cleaner and easier to understand. I'm a poor judge of code
elegance.
Cheers,
Michael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists