[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110425200235.645260924@pcw.home.local>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 22:03:33 +0200
From: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org,
stable-review@...nel.org
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
Subject: [PATCH 061/173] x25: Do not reference freed memory.
2.6.27.59-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
------------------
From: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
commit 96642d42f076101ba98866363d908cab706d156c upstream.
In x25_link_free(), we destroy 'nb' before dereferencing
'nb->dev'. Don't do this, because 'nb' might be freed
by then.
Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Tested-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
---
net/x25/x25_link.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/net/x25/x25_link.c
+++ b/net/x25/x25_link.c
@@ -391,9 +391,12 @@ void __exit x25_link_free(void)
write_lock_bh(&x25_neigh_list_lock);
list_for_each_safe(entry, tmp, &x25_neigh_list) {
+ struct net_device *dev;
+
nb = list_entry(entry, struct x25_neigh, node);
+ dev = nb->dev;
__x25_remove_neigh(nb);
- dev_put(nb->dev);
+ dev_put(dev);
}
write_unlock_bh(&x25_neigh_list_lock);
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists