[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BANLkTin7wSGi1=E2c2u6Jb5TG_KUpYh=Dw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 14:30:02 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Bruno Prémont <bonbons@...ux-vserver.org>
Cc: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@...il.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@...aro.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.39-rc4+: Kernel leaking memory during FS scanning, regression?
2011/4/25 Bruno Prémont <bonbons@...ux-vserver.org>:
>
> Between 1-slabinfo and 2-slabinfo some values increased (a lot) while a few
> ones did decrease. Don't know which ones are RCU-affected and which ones are
> not.
It really sounds as if the tiny-rcu kthread somehow just stops
handling callbacks. The ones that keep increasing do seem to be all
rcu-free'd (but I didn't really check).
The thing is shown as running:
root 6 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? R 22:14 0:00 \_
[rcu_kthread]
but nothing seems to happen and the CPU time hasn't increased at all.
I dunno. Makes no sense to me, but yeah, I'm definitely blaming
tiny-rcu. Paul, any ideas?
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists