[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201104251238.36005.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 12:38:35 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] freezer: use smp barriers
On Monday, April 25, 2011, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> The freezer processes are dealing with multiple threads running
> simultaneously, and on a UP system, the memory reads/writes do
> not need barriers to keep things in sync. These are only needed
> on SMP systems, so use SMP barriers instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>
Applied to suspend-2.6/linux-next.
Thanks,
Rafael
> ---
> kernel/freezer.c | 4 ++--
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/freezer.c b/kernel/freezer.c
> index 66ecd2e..7b01de9 100644
> --- a/kernel/freezer.c
> +++ b/kernel/freezer.c
> @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ static inline void frozen_process(void)
> {
> if (!unlikely(current->flags & PF_NOFREEZE)) {
> current->flags |= PF_FROZEN;
> - wmb();
> + smp_wmb();
> }
> clear_freeze_flag(current);
> }
> @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ bool freeze_task(struct task_struct *p, bool sig_only)
> * the task as frozen and next clears its TIF_FREEZE.
> */
> if (!freezing(p)) {
> - rmb();
> + smp_rmb();
> if (frozen(p))
> return false;
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists