linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/4] munmap: kbuild menu for munmap interface

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <BANLkTi=CHQ39hQZuvUdZ0z2OZxy2jksE_w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 26 Apr 2011 09:40:58 +0900
From:	Geunsik Lim <leemgs1@...il.com>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
	Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] munmap: kbuild menu for munmap interface

On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 12:31 AM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-04-25 at 19:44 +0900, Geunsik Lim wrote:
>> From: Geunsik Lim <geunsik.lim@...sung.com>
>>
>> Support kbuild menu to select memory unmap operation size
>> at build time.
>
> The subject and this line are not quite the same. The subject looks like
> it only modifies the kbuild options, not mm/memory.c as well. Please
> fix.
You are right. I will fix it.
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Geunsik Lim <geunsik.lim@...sung.com>
>> Acked-by: Hyunjin Choi <hj89.choi@...sung.com>
>> ---
>>  init/Kconfig |   70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  mm/memory.c  |   21 +++++++++++-----
>>  2 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>
>> --- a/mm/memory.c
>> +++ b/mm/memory.c
>> @@ -57,6 +57,7 @@
>>  #include <linux/swapops.h>
>>  #include <linux/elf.h>
>>  #include <linux/gfp.h>
>> +#include <linux/munmap_unit_size.h>
>>
>>  #include <asm/io.h>
>>  #include <asm/pgalloc.h>
>> @@ -1079,6 +1080,10 @@ static unsigned long unmap_page_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
>>                       (*zap_work)--;
>>                       continue;
>>               }
>> +#if 0
>> +printk("DEBUG:munmap step2,(%s:%d), unmap range = current(%lu) + \
>> +zap_work(%lu bytes) \n", current->comm, current->pid, addr, *zap_work);
>> +#endif
>
> No #if 0 debug printing in mainline.
Thank you for your advice.
>
>>               next = zap_pud_range(tlb, vma, pgd, addr, next,
>>                                               zap_work, details);
>>       } while (pgd++, addr = next, (addr != end && *zap_work > 0));
>> @@ -1088,12 +1093,10 @@ static unsigned long unmap_page_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
>>       return addr;
>>  }
>>
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT
>> -# define ZAP_BLOCK_SIZE      (8 * PAGE_SIZE)
>> -#else
>> -/* No preempt: go for improved straight-line efficiency */
>> -# define ZAP_BLOCK_SIZE      (1024 * PAGE_SIZE)
>> -#endif
>> +/* No preempt: go for improved straight-line efficiency
>> + * on PREEMPT(preemption mode) this is not a critical latency-path.
>> + */
>> +# define ZAP_BLOCK_SIZE        (munmap_unit_size * PAGE_SIZE)
>>
>>  /**
>>   * unmap_vmas - unmap a range of memory covered by a list of vma's
>> @@ -1133,7 +1136,11 @@ unsigned long unmap_vmas(struct mmu_gather **tlbp,
>>       spinlock_t *i_mmap_lock = details? details->i_mmap_lock: NULL;
>>       int fullmm = (*tlbp)->fullmm;
>>       struct mm_struct *mm = vma->vm_mm;
>> -
>> +#if 0
>> +printk("DEBUG:munmap step1,(%s:%d), unit=zap_work(%ld)/ZAP_BLOCK(%ld), \
>> +vma:[%8lu]=%lu-%lu \n", current->comm, current->pid, zap_work, ZAP_BLOCK_SIZE, \
>> +vma->vm_end - vma->vm_start, vma->vm_end, vma->vm_start);
>> +#endif
>
> Get rid of this too.
>
> Either have pr_debug(...) or nothing at all.
In fact, I wondered about this debug messages for just debugging. :)
Yes. I will remove this debug messages because it is not necessary
as you commented.
>
> -- Steve
>
>>       mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(mm, start_addr, end_addr);
>>       for ( ; vma && vma->vm_start < end_addr; vma = vma->vm_next) {
>>               unsigned long end;
>
>
>



-- 
Regards,
Geunsik Lim ( Samsung Electronics )
Blog : http://blog.naver.com/invain/
e-Mail: geunsik.lim@...sung.com
           leemgs@...il.com , leemgs1@...il.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/