linux-kernel - Re: [RFC]block: add flush request at head

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1303778955.3981.285.camel@sli10-conroe>
Date:	Tue, 26 Apr 2011 08:49:15 +0800
From:	Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>
To:	Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
Cc:	Jens Axboe <jaxboe@...ionio.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Shi, Alex" <alex.shi@...el.com>,
	"Chen, Tim C" <tim.c.chen@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC]block: add flush request at head

On Mon, 2011-04-25 at 16:21 +0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Shaohua.
> 
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 09:01:59AM +0800, Shaohua Li wrote:
> > this is a regression from 2.6.39-rc2 compared to 2.6.39-rc1, so this
> > isn't related to the flush rewritten. Workload is sysbench fileio,
> > please see the first mail at the thread for detail.
> 
> Understood.  Let's talk on the other thread.
This issue isn't related to the optimization patch in another thread.
And that patch can't recover the regression, which does improve
throughput even without the regression. So please look at issue again.

Thanks,
Shaohua


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/