[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110426114251.3d85eec8@mfleming-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 11:42:51 +0100
From: Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
"Nikita V. Youshchenko" <nyoushchenko@...sta.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] signal: do_sigtimedwait() needs
retarget_shared_pending()
On Sat, 23 Apr 2011 20:00:00 +0200
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> wrote:
> do_sigtimedwait() changes current->blocked and thus it needs
> set_current_bloked()->retarget_shared_pending().
If you do another version of this patch could you fix up the function
names in the commit log, s/set_current_bloked/set_current_blocked/ ? Or
maybe Andrew can fix it up if he pulls them into -mm.
> We could use set_current_bloked() directly. It is fine to change
> ->real_blocked from all-zeroes to ->blocked and vice versa lockless,
> but this is not immediately clear, looks racy, and needs a huge
> comment to explain why this is correct.
>
> To keep the things simple this patch adds the new static helper,
> __set_task_blocked() which should be called with ->siglock held. This
> way we can change both ->real_blocked and ->blocked atomically under
> ->siglock as the current code does. This is more understandable.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...ux.intel.com>
--
Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists