linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] 2.6.38: access permission filesystem 0.25

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87oc3tnto8.fsf@rat.lan>
Date:	Tue, 26 Apr 2011 13:22:47 +0200
From:	Olaf Dietsche <olaf+list.linux-kernel@...fdietsche.de>
To:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rod Cordova <rcordova@...ernet.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.6.38: access permission filesystem 0.25

Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com> writes:

> On 04/11/11 13:47, Olaf Dietsche wrote:
>
> +config ACCESSFS_USER_PORTS
> +	tristate "User permission based IP ports"
> +	depends on ACCESS_FS && INET
> +	select NET_HOOKS
> +	default n
> +	help
> +	  If you say Y here, you will be able to control access to IP ports
> +	  based on user-/groupid. For this to work, you must say Y
> +	  to CONFIG_NET_HOOKS.
>
> The last sentence of help text is unneeded and could be confusing to a user
> since the "select NET_HOOKS" is already done above.

Yes, I'll change this.

> Have you built this lately?  There have been a few vfs changes recently.
> Building on 2.6.39-rc4, I get this:
[compile errors snipped]

No, I haven't. I've built this against 2.6.38 only, as the subject says.
As soon as the need arises (and laziness allows ;-), I will look into it.

Regards, Olaf
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/