[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1303821049.18763.20.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 08:30:49 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Geunsik Lim <leemgs1@...il.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] munmap: Flexible mem unmap operation interface for
scheduling latency
On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 09:25 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-04-25 at 16:29 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-04-25 at 21:47 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >
> > > Also, -rt doesn't care since it already has preemptible mmu_gather.
> >
> > To be fair, he did state:
> >
> > > In general, This is not a critical latency-path on preemption mode
> > > (PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY / PREEMPT_DESKTOP / PREEMPT_RT)
>
> That doesn't parse for me... what does it say? The only one not listed
> is the non-preempt option, that wouldn't reschedule no matter what
> ZAP_BLOCK_SIZE.
Heh, it didn't parse for me, as I took PREEMPT_DESKTOP and thought it
said PREEMPT_NONE.
Oh well.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists