linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] sched: get rid of lock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 26 Apr 2011 15:03:39 +0200
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: get rid of lock_depth

On Friday 22 April 2011, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> Neil Brown pointed out that lock_depth somehow escaped the BKL removal
> work.  Let's get rid of it now.
> 
> Note that the perf scripting utilities still have a bunch of code for
> dealing with common_lock_depth in tracepoints; I have left that in place in
> case anybody wants to use that code with older kernels.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>

I wonder how I missed that, I certainly had a patch for this in the
beginning, but must have dropped it from my series later on.

Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/