[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110426142535.GA27417@router-fw-old.local.net-space.pl>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 16:25:35 +0200
From: Daniel Kiper <dkiper@...-space.pl>
To: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@...-lyon.org>
Cc: Daniel Kiper <dkiper@...-space.pl>, konrad.wilk@...cle.com,
stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com, xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH REPOST] pv-grub: Fix for incorrect dom->p2m_host[] list initialization
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 12:33:32AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Daniel Kiper, le Fri 22 Apr 2011 23:25:45 +0200, a ?crit :
> > If pfn of newly allocated page is less than currently requested pfn
> > then relevant earlier allocated mfn is overwritten which leads to
> > domain crash later.
>
> Oops, good catch! And unfortunately it happens seldomly... I guess it
> may be the culprit for a fair number of other issues.
I discovered that issue on domU i386. It does not affect x86_64
in my environment. However, as you stated above that issue in some
circumstances could lead to mysterious system crashes or data
corruptions.
> > + if (new_pfn < i)
> > + for (new_pfn = i; new_pfn < dom->total_pages; ++new_pfn)
> > + if (dom->p2m_host[new_pfn] == new_mfn)
> > + break;
>
> Instead of looking for the page, which takes a linear time for each page
> and thus potentially quadratic time, we should probably rather record
> which PFN the MFNs < allocated have been moved to?
I am going to post new time optimized version
of that patch today or tommorow.
Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists