linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.39-rc4+: Kernel leaking memory during FS scanning, regression?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <BANLkTikjuqWP+PAsObJH4EAOyzgr2RbYNA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 26 Apr 2011 10:18:22 -0700
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Bruno Prémont <bonbons@...ux-vserver.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc:	paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@...il.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@...aro.org>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.39-rc4+: Kernel leaking memory during FS scanning, regression?

On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Bruno Prémont
<bonbons@...ux-vserver.org> wrote:
>
> Just in case, /proc/$(pidof rcu_kthread)/status shows ~20k voluntary
> context switches and exactly one non-voluntary one.
>
> In addition when rcu_kthread has stopped doing its work
> `swapoff $(swapdevice)` seems to block forever (at least normal shutdown
> blocks on disabling swap device).
> If I get to do it when I get back home I will manually try to swapoff
> and take process traces with sysrq-t.

That "exactly one non-voluntary one" sounds like the smoking gun.

Normally SCHED_FIFO runs until it voluntarily gives up the CPU. That's
kind of the point of SCHED_FIFO. Involuntary context switches happen
when some higher-priority SCHED_FIFO process becomes runnable (irq
handlers? You _do_ have CONFIG_IRQ_FORCED_THREADING=y in your config
too), and maybe there is a bug in the runqueue handling for that case.

Ingo, do you have any tests for SCHED_FIFO scheduling? Particularly
with UP and voluntary preempt?

                          Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/