[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BANLkTino+9_GEb28gfZYSu-R0JW44M1mqQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 11:19:22 +0800
From: Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@...il.com>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] use oom_killer_disabled in all oom pathes
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 11:14 AM, KOSAKI Motohiro
<kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 10:57 AM, KOSAKI Motohiro
>> <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
>> >> oom_killer_disable should be a global switch, also fit for oom paths
>> >> other than __alloc_pages_slowpath
>> >>
>> >> Here add it to mem_cgroup_handle_oom and pagefault_out_of_memory as well.
>> >
>> > Can you please explain more? Why should? Now oom_killer_disabled is used
>> > only hibernation path. so, Why pagefault and memcg allocation will be happen?
>>
>> Indeed I'm using it in virtio balloon test, oom killer triggered when
>> memory pressure is high.
>>
>> literally oom_killer_disabled scope should be global, isn't it?
>
> ok. virtio baloon seems fair usage. if you add new usage of oom_killer_disabled
> into the patch description, I'll ack this one.
Thanks, then I will resend the virtio balloon patch along with this.
--
Regards
dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists