[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110426130724.f2ae18e3.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 13:07:24 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Nishimura Daisuke <d-nishimura@....biglobe.ne.jp>
Subject: Re: (resend) [PATCH] vmscan,memcg: memcg aware swap token
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 16:59:19 +0900 (JST)
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
> @@ -75,3 +76,19 @@ void __put_swap_token(struct mm_struct *mm)
> swap_token_mm = NULL;
> spin_unlock(&swap_token_lock);
> }
> +
> +int has_swap_token_memcg(struct mm_struct *mm, struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> +{
> + if (memcg) {
> + struct mem_cgroup *swap_token_memcg;
> +
> + /*
> + * memcgroup reclaim can disable swap token only if token task
> + * is in the same cgroup.
> + */
> + swap_token_memcg = try_get_mem_cgroup_from_mm(swap_token_mm);
> + return ((mm == swap_token_mm) && (memcg == swap_token_memcg));
> + } else
> + return (mm == swap_token_mm);
> +}
Seems to be missing a css_put()?
Either I'm mistaken or that's a bug. Perhaps neither of these would
have happened if we'd bothered to document
try_get_mem_cgroup_from_mm().
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists