linux-kernel - [PATCH] [89/106] NFS: nfs_wcc_update_inode() should set nfsi->attr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20110426211411.58C7A3E1886@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
Date:	Tue, 26 Apr 2011 14:14:11 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:	Trond.Myklebust@...app.com, gregkh@...e.de, ak@...ux.intel.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org,
	tim.bird@...sony.com
Subject: [PATCH] [89/106] NFS: nfs_wcc_update_inode() should set nfsi->attr_gencount

2.6.35-longterm review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------
From: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>

commit 27dc1cd3ad9300f81e1219e5fc305d91d85353f8 upstream.

If the call to nfs_wcc_update_inode() results in an attribute update, we
need to ensure that the inode's attr_gencount gets bumped too, otherwise
we are not protected against races with other GETATTR calls.

Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>

---
 fs/nfs/inode.c |   26 +++++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6.35.y/fs/nfs/inode.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.35.y.orig/fs/nfs/inode.c
+++ linux-2.6.35.y/fs/nfs/inode.c
@@ -811,9 +811,10 @@ out:
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static void nfs_wcc_update_inode(struct inode *inode, struct nfs_fattr *fattr)
+static unsigned long nfs_wcc_update_inode(struct inode *inode, struct nfs_fattr *fattr)
 {
 	struct nfs_inode *nfsi = NFS_I(inode);
+	unsigned long ret = 0;
 
 	if ((fattr->valid & NFS_ATTR_FATTR_PRECHANGE)
 			&& (fattr->valid & NFS_ATTR_FATTR_CHANGE)
@@ -821,25 +822,32 @@ static void nfs_wcc_update_inode(struct 
 		nfsi->change_attr = fattr->change_attr;
 		if (S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode))
 			nfsi->cache_validity |= NFS_INO_INVALID_DATA;
+		ret |= NFS_INO_INVALID_ATTR;
 	}
 	/* If we have atomic WCC data, we may update some attributes */
 	if ((fattr->valid & NFS_ATTR_FATTR_PRECTIME)
 			&& (fattr->valid & NFS_ATTR_FATTR_CTIME)
-			&& timespec_equal(&inode->i_ctime, &fattr->pre_ctime))
-			memcpy(&inode->i_ctime, &fattr->ctime, sizeof(inode->i_ctime));
+			&& timespec_equal(&inode->i_ctime, &fattr->pre_ctime)) {
+		memcpy(&inode->i_ctime, &fattr->ctime, sizeof(inode->i_ctime));
+		ret |= NFS_INO_INVALID_ATTR;
+	}
 
 	if ((fattr->valid & NFS_ATTR_FATTR_PREMTIME)
 			&& (fattr->valid & NFS_ATTR_FATTR_MTIME)
 			&& timespec_equal(&inode->i_mtime, &fattr->pre_mtime)) {
-			memcpy(&inode->i_mtime, &fattr->mtime, sizeof(inode->i_mtime));
-			if (S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode))
-				nfsi->cache_validity |= NFS_INO_INVALID_DATA;
+		memcpy(&inode->i_mtime, &fattr->mtime, sizeof(inode->i_mtime));
+		if (S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode))
+			nfsi->cache_validity |= NFS_INO_INVALID_DATA;
+		ret |= NFS_INO_INVALID_ATTR;
 	}
 	if ((fattr->valid & NFS_ATTR_FATTR_PRESIZE)
 			&& (fattr->valid & NFS_ATTR_FATTR_SIZE)
 			&& i_size_read(inode) == nfs_size_to_loff_t(fattr->pre_size)
-			&& nfsi->npages == 0)
-			i_size_write(inode, nfs_size_to_loff_t(fattr->size));
+			&& nfsi->npages == 0) {
+		i_size_write(inode, nfs_size_to_loff_t(fattr->size));
+		ret |= NFS_INO_INVALID_ATTR;
+	}
+	return ret;
 }
 
 /**
@@ -1153,7 +1161,7 @@ static int nfs_update_inode(struct inode
 			| NFS_INO_REVAL_PAGECACHE);
 
 	/* Do atomic weak cache consistency updates */
-	nfs_wcc_update_inode(inode, fattr);
+	invalid |= nfs_wcc_update_inode(inode, fattr);
 
 	/* More cache consistency checks */
 	if (fattr->valid & NFS_ATTR_FATTR_CHANGE) {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/