[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110426211257.B95193E1886@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 14:12:57 -0700 (PDT)
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Artem.Bityutskiy@...ia.com, gregkh@...e.de, ak@...ux.intel.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org,
tim.bird@...sony.com
Subject: [PATCH] [19/106] UBIFS: fix debugging failure in dbg_check_space_info
2.6.35-longterm review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@...ia.com>
commit 7da6443aca9be29c6948dcbd636ad50154d0bc0c upstream.
This patch fixes a debugging failure with which looks like this:
UBIFS error (pid 32313): dbg_check_space_info: free space changed from 6019344 to 6022654
The reason for this failure is described in the comment this patch adds
to the code. But in short - 'c->freeable_cnt' may be different before
and after re-mounting, and this is normal. So the debugging code should
make sure that free space calculations do not depend on 'c->freeable_cnt'.
A similar issue has been reported here:
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2011-April/034647.html
This patch should fix it.
For the -stable guys: this patch is only relevant for kernels 2.6.30
onwards.
Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@...ia.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
---
fs/ubifs/debug.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6.35.y/fs/ubifs/debug.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.35.y.orig/fs/ubifs/debug.c
+++ linux-2.6.35.y/fs/ubifs/debug.c
@@ -961,11 +961,39 @@ void dbg_dump_index(struct ubifs_info *c
void dbg_save_space_info(struct ubifs_info *c)
{
struct ubifs_debug_info *d = c->dbg;
-
- ubifs_get_lp_stats(c, &d->saved_lst);
+ int freeable_cnt;
spin_lock(&c->space_lock);
+ memcpy(&d->saved_lst, &c->lst, sizeof(struct ubifs_lp_stats));
+
+ /*
+ * We use a dirty hack here and zero out @c->freeable_cnt, because it
+ * affects the free space calculations, and UBIFS might not know about
+ * all freeable eraseblocks. Indeed, we know about freeable eraseblocks
+ * only when we read their lprops, and we do this only lazily, upon the
+ * need. So at any given point of time @c->freeable_cnt might be not
+ * exactly accurate.
+ *
+ * Just one example about the issue we hit when we did not zero
+ * @c->freeable_cnt.
+ * 1. The file-system is mounted R/O, c->freeable_cnt is %0. We save the
+ * amount of free space in @d->saved_free
+ * 2. We re-mount R/W, which makes UBIFS to read the "lsave"
+ * information from flash, where we cache LEBs from various
+ * categories ('ubifs_remount_fs()' -> 'ubifs_lpt_init()'
+ * -> 'lpt_init_wr()' -> 'read_lsave()' -> 'ubifs_lpt_lookup()'
+ * -> 'ubifs_get_pnode()' -> 'update_cats()'
+ * -> 'ubifs_add_to_cat()').
+ * 3. Lsave contains a freeable eraseblock, and @c->freeable_cnt
+ * becomes %1.
+ * 4. We calculate the amount of free space when the re-mount is
+ * finished in 'dbg_check_space_info()' and it does not match
+ * @d->saved_free.
+ */
+ freeable_cnt = c->freeable_cnt;
+ c->freeable_cnt = 0;
d->saved_free = ubifs_get_free_space_nolock(c);
+ c->freeable_cnt = freeable_cnt;
spin_unlock(&c->space_lock);
}
@@ -982,12 +1010,15 @@ int dbg_check_space_info(struct ubifs_in
{
struct ubifs_debug_info *d = c->dbg;
struct ubifs_lp_stats lst;
- long long avail, free;
+ long long free;
+ int freeable_cnt;
spin_lock(&c->space_lock);
- avail = ubifs_calc_available(c, c->min_idx_lebs);
+ freeable_cnt = c->freeable_cnt;
+ c->freeable_cnt = 0;
+ free = ubifs_get_free_space_nolock(c);
+ c->freeable_cnt = freeable_cnt;
spin_unlock(&c->space_lock);
- free = ubifs_get_free_space(c);
if (free != d->saved_free) {
ubifs_err("free space changed from %lld to %lld",
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists