[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1303887457.2699.60.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 08:57:37 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Lifeng Sun <lifongsun@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Applying inappropriate ioctl operation on socket
should return ENOTTY
Le mercredi 27 avril 2011 à 14:37 +0800, Lifeng Sun a écrit :
> On 07:58 Wed 04/27/11 Apr, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > Really ?
> >
> > EINVAL is ok too : Request or argp is not valid.
>
> I'm afraid not. SUSv4 specifies, say,
>
> int tcsetattr(int fildes, int optional_actions,
> const struct termios *termios_p);
>
> ERROR:
> [EINVAL]
> The optional_actions argument is not a supported value, or an
> attempt was made to change an attribute represented in the
> termios structure to an unsupported value.
>
> [ENOTTY]
> The file associated with fildes is not a terminal.
>
> which means when we apply tcsetattr (implemented by ioctl) to _any_
> non-terminal file descriptor, it should set errno to ENOTTY rather
> than EINVAL.
>
You quote manpage for a library call, not a system call.
If you feel your glibc doesnt implement well this, please complain to
glibc maintainer.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists