[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110427082226.GB5726@merkur.ravnborg.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 10:22:26 +0200
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>,
linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3.1] kbuild: implement several W= levels
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 10:43:07PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 09:52:35PM +0200, Michal Marek wrote:
> > On 22.4.2011 19:50, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > > From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
> > >
> > > Building a kernel with "make W=1" produce far too much noise
> > > to be usefull.
> > >
> > > Divide the warning options in three groups:
> > >
> > > W=1 - warnings that may be relevant and does not occur too often
> > > W=2 - warnings that occur quite often but may still be relevant
> > > W=3 - the more obscure warnings, can most likely be ignored
> > >
> > > When building init/ on my box the levels produces:
> > >
> > > W=1 - 46 warnings
> > > W=2 - 863 warnings
> > > W=3 - 6496 warnings
> >
> > I guess these numbers are not valid after your changes? Not that the
> > exact numbers are important, but maybe the distribution change?
>
> I think so too that those numbers don't mean a lot.
The numbers _only_ tell you that the amoun of warnings on W=1
is down to a manageable number and they increase be the higher
level.
Will you cook up a more correct changelog and resubmit?
Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists