| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1303920491-25302-10-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 17:08:07 +0100
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
To: Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Linux-Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Subject: [PATCH 09/13] netvm: Set PF_MEMALLOC as appropriate during SKB processing
In order to make sure pfmemalloc packets receive all memory needed to proceed,
ensure processing of pfmemalloc SKBs happens under PF_MEMALLOC. This is
limited to a subset of protocols that are expected to be used for writing
to swap. Taps are not allowed to use PF_MEMALLOC as these are expected to
communicate with userspace processes which could be paged out.
[a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl: Ideas taken from various patches]
[jslaby@...e.cz: Lock imbalance fix]
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
---
include/net/sock.h | 5 +++++
net/core/dev.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
net/core/sock.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h
index e3aaa88..e928880 100644
--- a/include/net/sock.h
+++ b/include/net/sock.h
@@ -668,8 +668,13 @@ static inline __must_check int sk_add_backlog(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *s
return 0;
}
+extern int __sk_backlog_rcv(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb);
+
static inline int sk_backlog_rcv(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
+ if (skb_pfmemalloc(skb))
+ return __sk_backlog_rcv(sk, skb);
+
return sk->sk_backlog_rcv(sk, skb);
}
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 3871bf6..0b69efb 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -3095,6 +3095,23 @@ static void vlan_on_bond_hook(struct sk_buff *skb)
}
}
+/*
+ * Limit which protocols can use the PFMEMALLOC reserves to those that are
+ * expected to be used for communication with swap.
+ */
+static bool skb_pfmemalloc_protocol(struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+ switch (skb->protocol) {
+ case __constant_htons(ETH_P_ARP):
+ case __constant_htons(ETH_P_IP):
+ case __constant_htons(ETH_P_IPV6):
+ case __constant_htons(ETH_P_8021Q):
+ return true;
+ default:
+ return false;
+ }
+}
+
static int __netif_receive_skb(struct sk_buff *skb)
{
struct packet_type *ptype, *pt_prev;
@@ -3104,15 +3121,28 @@ static int __netif_receive_skb(struct sk_buff *skb)
bool deliver_exact = false;
int ret = NET_RX_DROP;
__be16 type;
+ unsigned long pflags = current->flags;
if (!netdev_tstamp_prequeue)
net_timestamp_check(skb);
trace_netif_receive_skb(skb);
+ /*
+ * PFMEMALLOC skbs are special, they should
+ * - be delivered to SOCK_MEMALLOC sockets only
+ * - stay away from userspace
+ * - have bounded memory usage
+ *
+ * Use PF_MEMALLOC as this saves us from propagating the allocation
+ * context down to all allocation sites.
+ */
+ if (skb_pfmemalloc(skb))
+ current->flags |= PF_MEMALLOC;
+
/* if we've gotten here through NAPI, check netpoll */
if (netpoll_receive_skb(skb))
- return NET_RX_DROP;
+ goto out;
if (!skb->skb_iif)
skb->skb_iif = skb->dev->ifindex;
@@ -3143,6 +3173,9 @@ another_round:
}
#endif
+ if (skb_pfmemalloc(skb))
+ goto skip_taps;
+
list_for_each_entry_rcu(ptype, &ptype_all, list) {
if (!ptype->dev || ptype->dev == skb->dev) {
if (pt_prev)
@@ -3151,13 +3184,17 @@ another_round:
}
}
+skip_taps:
#ifdef CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT
skb = handle_ing(skb, &pt_prev, &ret, orig_dev);
if (!skb)
- goto out;
+ goto unlock;
ncls:
#endif
+ if (skb_pfmemalloc(skb) && !skb_pfmemalloc_protocol(skb))
+ goto drop;
+
rx_handler = rcu_dereference(skb->dev->rx_handler);
if (rx_handler) {
if (pt_prev) {
@@ -3166,7 +3203,7 @@ ncls:
}
switch (rx_handler(&skb)) {
case RX_HANDLER_CONSUMED:
- goto out;
+ goto unlock;
case RX_HANDLER_ANOTHER:
goto another_round;
case RX_HANDLER_EXACT:
@@ -3210,6 +3247,7 @@ ncls:
if (pt_prev) {
ret = pt_prev->func(skb, skb->dev, pt_prev, orig_dev);
} else {
+drop:
atomic_long_inc(&skb->dev->rx_dropped);
kfree_skb(skb);
/* Jamal, now you will not able to escape explaining
@@ -3218,8 +3256,10 @@ ncls:
ret = NET_RX_DROP;
}
-out:
+unlock:
rcu_read_unlock();
+out:
+ tsk_restore_flags(current, pflags, PF_MEMALLOC);
return ret;
}
diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
index 8308609..ac36807 100644
--- a/net/core/sock.c
+++ b/net/core/sock.c
@@ -245,6 +245,22 @@ void sk_clear_memalloc(struct sock *sk)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sk_clear_memalloc);
+int __sk_backlog_rcv(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+ int ret;
+ unsigned long pflags = current->flags;
+
+ /* these should have been dropped before queueing */
+ BUG_ON(!sock_flag(sk, SOCK_MEMALLOC));
+
+ current->flags |= PF_MEMALLOC;
+ ret = sk->sk_backlog_rcv(sk, skb);
+ tsk_restore_flags(current, pflags, PF_MEMALLOC);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(__sk_backlog_rcv);
+
#if defined(CONFIG_CGROUPS) && !defined(CONFIG_NET_CLS_CGROUP)
int net_cls_subsys_id = -1;
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(net_cls_subsys_id);
--
1.7.3.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists