[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4DB86A2D.3030406@codeaurora.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 12:10:37 -0700
From: Michael Bohan <mbohan@...eaurora.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
CC: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] x86: Allow the user not to build hw_breakpoints
On 4/27/2011 11:26 AM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 10:38:50AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>>
>> How big of a win, if any, is this, really?
>
> That's pretty significant, because if you can disable breakpoints,
> then you can disable perf. Together they make quite a chunk.
Another advantage is the ability to disable these features for kernel
bringup on new targets and kernel versions. Recently in v2.6.38
hw_breakpoints were broken in ARM. A change like this would have saved
me a hack to the Kconfig at the least.
Mike
--
Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists