[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4DB87D93.4060108@zytor.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 13:33:23 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RESEND] Fix EDD3.0 data verification.
On 04/27/2011 05:32 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
>
> This patch is only fixes obviously incorrect code in edd_has_edd30()
> to do proper check instead of summing random memory and it should be
> applied even if we decide that we want to support Phoenix spec too.
>
> I looked into implementing support for Phoenix spec back then when I
> wrote the patch and I decided against it. The main (and may be only)
> use case for edd module is to provide OS installer with enough info
> for it to decide where to install boot loader. Unfortunately Phoenix
> EDD spec does not support most modern storage technologies and even for
> legacy one such as ATA it does not provide enough info to determine boot
> disk correctly (you can't tell the difference between two ATA channels,
> T13 spec provides this info in interface path along with PCI address).
> So even if we would have support for it the OS installer will have to
> check if the information comes from T13 or Phoenix and ignore it if it's
> the later.
>
I still think it would be a lot better to let userspace decide how it
wants to handle things, but oh well.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists