linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.39-rc4+: Kernel leaking memory during FS scanning, regression?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110427215549.GN2135@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Wed, 27 Apr 2011 14:55:49 -0700
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Bruno Prémont <bonbons@...ux-vserver.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@...il.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@...aro.org>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.39-rc4+: Kernel leaking memory during FS scanning,
 regression?

On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 12:28:37AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Apr 2011, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Bruno Prémont
> > <bonbons@...ux-vserver.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Just in case, /proc/$(pidof rcu_kthread)/status shows ~20k voluntary
> > > context switches and exactly one non-voluntary one.
> > >
> > > In addition when rcu_kthread has stopped doing its work
> > > `swapoff $(swapdevice)` seems to block forever (at least normal shutdown
> > > blocks on disabling swap device).
> > > If I get to do it when I get back home I will manually try to swapoff
> > > and take process traces with sysrq-t.
> > 
> > That "exactly one non-voluntary one" sounds like the smoking gun.
> > 
> > Normally SCHED_FIFO runs until it voluntarily gives up the CPU. That's
> > kind of the point of SCHED_FIFO. Involuntary context switches happen
> > when some higher-priority SCHED_FIFO process becomes runnable (irq
> > handlers? You _do_ have CONFIG_IRQ_FORCED_THREADING=y in your config
> > too), and maybe there is a bug in the runqueue handling for that case.
> 
> The forced irq threading is only effective when you add the command
> line parameter "threadirqs". I don't see any irq threads in the ps
> outputs, so that's not the problem.
> 
> Though the whole ps output is weird. There is only one thread/process
> which accumulated CPU time
> 
> collectd  1605  0.6  0.7  49924  3748 ?        SNLsl 22:14   0:14

I believe that the above is the script that prints out the RCU debugfs
information periodically.  Unless there is something else that begins
with "collectd" instead of just collectdebugfs.sh.

							Thanx, Paul

> All others show 0:00 CPU time - not only kthread_rcu.
> 
> Bruno, are you running on real hardware or in a virtual machine?
> 
> Can you please enable CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG and provide the output of
> /proc/sched_stat when the problem surfaces and a minute after the
> first snapshot?
> 
> Also please apply the patch below and check, whether the printk shows
> up in your dmesg.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 	tglx
> 
> ---
>  kernel/sched_rt.c |    1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> Index: linux-2.6-tip/kernel/sched_rt.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6-tip.orig/kernel/sched_rt.c
> +++ linux-2.6-tip/kernel/sched_rt.c
> @@ -609,6 +609,7 @@ static int sched_rt_runtime_exceeded(str
> 
>  	if (rt_rq->rt_time > runtime) {
>  		rt_rq->rt_throttled = 1;
> +		printk_once(KERN_WARNING "sched: RT throttling activated\n");
>  		if (rt_rq_throttled(rt_rq)) {
>  			sched_rt_rq_dequeue(rt_rq);
>  			return 1;

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/