[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BANLkTin_ZPDmXirK4MmmV5LaC6zmpb+qmw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 19:17:11 -0300
From: Thiago Farina <tfransosi@...il.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] linux/string.h: Introduce streq macro.
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 6:46 PM, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> That's the whole fucking _point_; adding random extensions to the language
> leads to the place where Pascal and LISP are and it's not pretty. Each
> might make sense taken separately (hell, bzero(3) would prevent real, honest
> to Cthulhu bugs - it's memset(p, 0, n) and we had memset-with-swapped-arguments
> bugs fairly often and yes, in our tree most of memset() callers do pass '\0'
> as the second argument). Pile enough of those together and you've got yourself
> a dialect only you understand. _Bad_ idea, since the next thing that happens
> is different dialects in different parts of tree. And the end of non-incestous
> code review and fixes. I've seen it first-hand (OK, second - I had enough
> sense to stay out of that particular clusterfuck) on Algol 68 codebase. I
> *really*, *really* do not want to see anything similar ever again. Especially
> on projects I can't just piss upon and walk away from. The fact that in C
> you *can* extend the language that way doesn't make it a good idea.
>
> While we are at it, strcmp() is, indeed, a part of the language.
Part of the C standard library you mean, no?
> See
> section 7.21.4.2 in C99.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists