[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1303883910.2699.53.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 07:58:30 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Lifeng Sun <lifongsun@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Applying inappropriate ioctl operation on socket
should return ENOTTY
Le mercredi 27 avril 2011 à 13:37 +0800, Lifeng Sun a écrit :
> ioctl() calls against a socket with an inappropriate ioctl operation
> are incorrectly returning EINVAL rather than ENOTTY:
>
> [ENOTTY]
> Inappropriate I/O control operation.
>
> BugLink: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33992
>
> This bug is not limited to socket, it also occurs in a lot of, maybe
> some hundred, other ioctl operations, while in the patch I only fixed
> about a dozen of additional ones in pipe, fifo and character device
> drivers.
Really ?
EINVAL is ok too : Request or argp is not valid.
I would say, its not a bug as you claim.
Its really too late to make such change and risk regressions.
isatty(fd) performs well. Please use it instead.
Also, networking patches should be sent to netdev@...r.kernel.org and
David Miller, as mentioned in MAINTAINERS file.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists