[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110427060642.GA11727@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 02:06:42 -0400
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Mel Gorman <mel@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>,
Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@...bb4u.ne.jp>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] split inode_wb_list_lock into bdi_writeback.list_lock
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 02:42:09PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Has this patch been well tested under lockdep?
Yes. There's only two places locking two bdis, and both use the
bdi_lock_two helper which imposes an ordering, and tells lockdep about
it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists