[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110427083742.084bda90@mschwide.boeblingen.de.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 08:37:42 +0200
From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] s390 patches for 2.6.39-rc4
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 11:38:22 -0700
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> I'll pull this, but:
>
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 2:03 AM, Martin Schwidefsky
> <schwidefsky@...ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > Jan Glauber (3):
> > [S390] prng: prevent access beyond end of stack
>
> I don't think that's _still_ correct.
>
> Just looking at the diff, it looks broken:
>
> > /* Add the entropy */
> > while (nbytes >= 8) {
> > - *((__u64 *)parm_block) ^= *((__u64 *)buf+i*8);
> > + *((__u64 *)parm_block) ^= *((__u64 *)buf+i);
> > prng_add_entropy();
> > i += 8;
> > nbytes -= 8;
>
> The "i += 8" implies that "i" is a byte offset.
>
> But "(__u64 *)buf+i" will parse as "((__u64 *)buf) + i" and thus still
> do another multiply-by-eight.
>
> So the diff fixes one "off by a factor of 8", but not another, if I
> read it right.
>
> So the parenthesis should be moved around to something like "*(__u64
> *) (buf+i)", I think.
Urgs, pointer arithmetic for dummies.. it is indeed still wrong. We'll fix.
--
blue skies,
Martin.
"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists