[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1303970068.3676.18.camel@clockmaker-el6>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 15:54:28 +1000
From: Dave Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/nouveau: Remove interrupt handler around
suspend/resume
On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 23:20 -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> We're often using a shared interrupt line for nouveau, so we have
> to be prepared that it could be called at any point in time. If
> we've suspended the device via vga switcheroo and get a stray
> interrupt on the line from another device, we'll read back -1 from
> the device and head down all sorts of strange paths, most of which
> eventually lock the system.
>
> On my system (Asus UL30VT) the interrupt line is shared with USB.
> Attempting to disable the USB bluetooth device seems to trigger
> a stray interrupt that ends up in nv04_fifo_isr() where we
> eventually hit the "PFIFO still angry after 100 spins, halt",
> which kills the system.
>
> Using free_irq/request_irq around the suspend seems to be a
> reliable fix. Attempting to flag the device state in
> nouvea_irq_handler(), similar to the intel_lid_notify() fix
> is too racy since we can power off the device as an interrupt
> is being processed.
The actual solution is to check if we read back all Fs and return from
the irq handler. Robust irq handlers are generally considered a good
idea esp around race conditions at suspend/resume time.
Dave.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists