[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110428161933.1f1266e6@notabene.brown>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 16:19:33 +1000
From: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Cc: Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Linux-Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/13] netvm: Allow skb allocation to use PFMEMALLOC
reserves
On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 17:08:06 +0100 Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de> wrote:
> @@ -1578,7 +1589,7 @@ static inline struct sk_buff *netdev_alloc_skb_ip_align(struct net_device *dev,
> */
> static inline struct page *__netdev_alloc_page(struct net_device *dev, gfp_t gfp_mask)
> {
> - return alloc_pages_node(NUMA_NO_NODE, gfp_mask, 0);
> + return alloc_pages_node(NUMA_NO_NODE, gfp_mask | __GFP_MEMALLOC, 0);
> }
>
I'm puzzling a bit over this change.
__netdev_alloc_page appears to be used to get pages to put in ring buffer
for a network card to DMA received packets into. So it is OK to use
__GFP_MEMALLOC for these allocations providing we mark the resulting skb as
'pfmemalloc' if a reserved page was used.
However I don't see where that marking is done.
I think it should be in skb_fill_page_desc, something like:
if (page->pfmemalloc)
skb->pfmemalloc = true;
Is this covered somewhere else that I am missing?
Thanks,
NeilBrown
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists