[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110428095028.GN31407@erda.amd.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 11:50:29 +0200
From: Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] perf, x86: Fix event scheduler for constraints with
overlapping counters
On 19.04.11 15:55:18, Robert Richter wrote:
> On 19.04.11 07:29:33, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com> wrote:
> >
> > > + if (!state)
> > > + /* no events to reschedule */
> > > + goto done;
> >
> > Hm, that's 5 levels of indentation. Would it be possible to factor out the gist
> > of the logic into a helper and such? My eyes would be much happier!
>
> Hmm, I was thinking about this too, but it is not easy since we
> control also the loops with goto's and updates of the loop
> states. Refactoring out the inner block would mean to update state
> varables via pointers and to introduce return codes which contains
> control flow information. Don't think this will become easier.
>
> We could probably merge both for-loops in one while-loop but also on
> costs of code readability.
Ingo, do you still want me to rework it?
Any other comments on this patch?
Thanks,
-Robert
--
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Operating System Research Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists