linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] ARM DMA mapping TODO, v1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 28 Apr 2011 12:27:21 +0200
From:	Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:	linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] ARM DMA mapping TODO, v1

On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 09:29:16PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> 4. Implement an architecture independent version of dma_map_ops
>    based on the iommu.h API. As Joerg mentioned, this has been
>    missing for some time, and it would be better to do it once
>    than for each IOMMU separately. This is probably a lot of work.

Yes, thats missing for a long time. It will also need some changes to
the IOMMU-API but that should be doable. The best would be to extend the
IOMMU-API so that it also supports GART-like IOMMUs. This way every
dma_ops implementation on all the architectures providing such an IOMMU
could be covered with the architecture independent dma_ops
implementation. This would only leave the low-level hardware access in
the IOMMU drivers.
I think this also requires to change the current semantics of the
existing IOMMU-API implementations. I will prepare a write-up of my
ideas for discussion.

Regards,

	Joerg

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/