[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110428104306.GC2431@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 12:43:06 +0200
From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...ell.com>
Cc: mingo@...e.hu, tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] allow placing exception table in .rodata (and do so on
x86)
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 04:36:04PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> This is since the table is really a set of pointers, i.e. misplaced in
> .text.
>
> Quite likely other architectures would want to follow.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...ell.com>
>
[...]
> --- 2.6.39-rc5/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h
> +++ 2.6.39-rc5-extable-in-rodata/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h
> @@ -226,6 +226,7 @@
> *(.rodata1) \
> } \
> \
> + EXCEPTION_TABLE_RO \
That's odd. The kernel actually writes to it (sort_main_extable()), so
it shouldn't be in the ro data section, but the data section.
> JUMP_TABLE \
same here.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists