linux-kernel - Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [RFC] ARM DMA mapping TODO, v1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110428105131.GD17290@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Thu, 28 Apr 2011 11:51:31 +0100
From:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To:	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Cc:	'Benjamin Herrenschmidt' <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	'Arnd Bergmann' <arnd@...db.de>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [RFC] ARM DMA mapping TODO, v1

On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 12:32:32PM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> On Thursday, April 28, 2011 11:38 AM Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > > > > 2. Implement dma_alloc_noncoherent on ARM. Marek pointed out
> > > > >    that this is needed, and it currently is not implemented, with
> > > > >    an outdated comment explaining why it used to not be possible
> > > > >    to do it.
> > > >
> > > > dma_alloc_noncoherent is an entirely pointless API afaics.
> > >
> > > I was about to ask what the point is ... (what is the expected
> > > semantic ? Memory that is reachable but not necessarily cache
> > > coherent ?)
> > 
> > As far as I can see, dma_alloc_noncoherent() should just be a wrapper
> > around the normal page allocation function.  I don't see it ever needing
> > to do anything special - and the advantage of just being the normal
> > page allocation function is that its properties are well known and
> > architecture independent.
> 
> If there is IOMMU chip that supports pages larger than 4KiB then
> dma_alloc_noncoherent() might try to allocate such larger pages what will
> result in faster access to the buffer (lower iommu tlb miss ratio).
> For large buffers even 64KiB 'pages' gives a significant performance
> improvement.

The memory allocated by dma_alloc_noncoherent() (and dma_alloc_coherent())
has to be virtually contiguous, and DMA contiguous.  It is assumed by all
drivers that:

	virt = dma_alloc_foo(size, &dma);

	cpuaddr = virt + offset;
	dmaaddr = dma + offset;

results in the CPU and DMA seeing ultimately the same address for cpuaddr
and dmaaddr for 0 <= offset < size.

The standard alloc_pages() also ensures that if you ask for an order-N
page, you'll end up with that allocation being contiguous - so there's
no difference there.

What I'd suggest is that dma_alloc_noncoherent() should be architecture
independent, and should call into whatever iommu support the device has
to setup an approprite iommu mapping.  IOW, I don't see any need for
every architecture to provide its own dma_alloc_noncoherent() allocation
function - or indeed every iommu implementation to deal with the
allocation issues either.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/