[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BANLkTim=D3sHAGyGzzLCL5ZxA71sdDdAiA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 22:41:07 +0200
From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...glemail.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Bruno Prémont <bonbons@...ux-vserver.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@...il.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@...aro.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.39-rc4+: Kernel leaking memory during FS scanning, regression?
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 8:49 PM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Apr 2011, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 3:30 PM, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de> wrote:
>> rt_rq[0]:
>> .rt_nr_running : 0
>> .rt_throttled : 0
>
>> .rt_time : 888.893877
>
>> .rt_time : 950.005460
>
> So rt_time is constantly accumulated, but never decreased. The
> decrease happens in the timer callback. Looks like the timer is not
> running for whatever reason.
>
> Can you add the following patch as well ?
>
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
>
> --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched.c
> +++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
> @@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart sched_rt_per
> idle = do_sched_rt_period_timer(rt_b, overrun);
> }
>
> - return idle ? HRTIMER_NORESTART : HRTIMER_RESTART;
> + return HRTIMER_RESTART;
> }
>
> static
>
See tarball.
- Sedat -
Download attachment "from-dileks-3.tar.xz" of type "application/octet-stream" (20740 bytes)
Download attachment "from-dileks-3.tar.xz.sha256sum" of type "application/octet-stream" (87 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists