linux-kernel - Re: [git pull] m68k SLUB fix for 2.6.39

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1104281437010.21665@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date:	Thu, 28 Apr 2011 14:41:50 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To:	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...e.de>
cc:	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>, linux-m68k@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [git pull] m68k SLUB fix for 2.6.39

On Thu, 28 Apr 2011, James Bottomley wrote:

> > Since 4a5fa3590f09 ([PARISC] slub: fix panic with DISCONTIGMEM) from 
> > 2.6.39-rc4, you can't actually select slub on m68k without CONFIG_ADVANCED 
> > and CONFIG_SINGLE_MEMORY_CHUNK because it otherwises defaults to 
> > discontigmem.
> > 
> > James tested hppa64 with my N_NORMAL_MEMORY fix and found that it turned 
> > an SMP box into UP.  If you've tested slub on m68k without regressions, 
> > then perhaps you'd like to add a "|| M68K" to CONFIG_SLUB?
> 
> To be honest, I really don't see that fixing it.  As soon as you
> allocate memory beyond range zero, you move onto a non-zero node as far
> as slub is concerned, and that will oops.
> 

Possible nodes are represented in slub with N_NORMAL_MEMORY, so the 
kmem_cache_node structures are allocated and initialized based on this 
nodemask.  As long as the memory ranges map to nodes set in the nodemask, 
this should be fine.

> I think what the N_NORMAL_MEMORY patch did is just make it take a whiile
> before you start allocating from that range.  Try executing a memory
> balloon on the platform; that was how we first demonstrated the problem
> on parisc.
> 

With parisc, you encountered an oops in add_partial() because the 
kmem_cache_node structure for the memory range returned by page_to_nid() 
was not allocated.  init_kmem_cache_nodes() takes care of this for all 
memory ranges set in N_NORMAL_MEMORY.

Adding Christoph and Pekka to the cc if there is additional concerns about 
slub on this architecture.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/