linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/7] seccomp_filter: add process state reporting

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.00.1104290853280.26322@tundra.namei.org>
Date:	Fri, 29 Apr 2011 08:54:26 +1000 (EST)
From:	James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
To:	Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>
cc:	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kees.cook@...onical.com,
	eparis@...hat.com, agl@...omium.org, mingo@...e.hu,
	rostedt@...dmis.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Stephen Wilson <wilsons@...rt.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] seccomp_filter: add process state reporting

On Wed, 27 Apr 2011, Will Drewry wrote:

> > Can't you make individual seccomp specific file?
> 
> Definitely.  Would it make sense to have /proc/<pid>/seccomp and
> /proc/<pid>/seccomp_filter?

Do you need the separate seccomp file vs. just checking what's in 
seccomp_filter ?


-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@...ei.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/