[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1304077641.2513.242.camel@pasglop>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 21:47:21 +1000
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] ARM DMA mapping TODO, v1
On Fri, 2011-04-29 at 13:26 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 28 April 2011, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > > >
> > > > For PCI you can have the flag propagate from the PHB down, for busses
> > > > without a bus type (platform) then whoever instanciate them (the
> > > > platform code) can set that appropriately.
> > >
> > > How can you do that when it changes mid-bus heirarchy? I'm thinking
> > > of the situation where the DRM stuff is on a child bus below the
> > > root bus, and the root bus has DMA coherent devices on it but the DRM
> > > stuff doesn't.
> >
> > But that's not PCI right ? IE. with PCI, coherency is a property of the
> > PHB...
>
> That is my understanding at least, but I'd like to have a confirmation
> from the DRM folks.
>
> I believe that the PC graphics cards that have noncoherent DMA mappings
> are all of the unified memory (integrated into the northbridge) kind,
> so they are not on the same host bridge as all regular PCI devices,
> even if they appear as a PCI device.
Hrm... beware with x86 , they love playing tricks :-) Since too many
BIOSes don't understand PCI domains, they make devices on separate
bridges look like sibling on the same segment and that sort of thing.
Cheers,
Ben.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists