[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1304080487.21536.16.camel@marge.simson.net>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 14:34:47 +0200
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To: Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>
Cc: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: query: [PATCH 2/2] cgroup: Remove call to synchronize_rcu in
cgroup_attach_task
(ok crickets, keep the noise down please)
On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 11:38 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> The explosions are because the logic to snag rmdir() should anyone grab
> a reference will let us zip right through and free a cgroup while
> there's a destruction in flight. Adding a cgrp->count check before
> trying to cgroup_clear_css_refs() prevents the explosions, but that
> leaves RCU grace periods still embedded in userspace.
>
> So...
>
> I bent up put_css_set() a bit to try to destroy synchronously on final
> put if possible, so rmdir() will only be snagged if that fails. The
> thing seems to be working, so I'll show it. Readers (beware) may notice
> some gratuitous looking chicken scratches. Just ignore those, and move
> along smartly to the suggesting a much better way part, for surely one
> must exist.
Hi Self, (*howdy*)
You might try the below. No weird gyrations to accomplish the same
thing, and I see no slub debug gripes, no list debug gripes, nada.
Makes one wonder what these things do for a living.
diff --git a/kernel/cgroup.c b/kernel/cgroup.c
index 25c7eb5..b8c64bf 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup.c
@@ -826,13 +826,6 @@ static void cgroup_diput(struct dentry *dentry, struct inode *inode)
struct cgroup *cgrp = dentry->d_fsdata;
struct cgroup_subsys *ss;
BUG_ON(!(cgroup_is_removed(cgrp)));
- /* It's possible for external users to be holding css
- * reference counts on a cgroup; css_put() needs to
- * be able to access the cgroup after decrementing
- * the reference count in order to know if it needs to
- * queue the cgroup to be handled by the release
- * agent */
- synchronize_rcu();
mutex_lock(&cgroup_mutex);
/*
@@ -1822,7 +1815,6 @@ int cgroup_attach_task(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct task_struct *tsk)
ss->attach(ss, cgrp, oldcgrp, tsk, false);
}
set_bit(CGRP_RELEASABLE, &oldcgrp->flags);
- synchronize_rcu();
put_css_set(cg);
/*
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists