[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1304083095.2548.1.camel@localhost>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 21:18:15 +0800
From: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/2] perf probe: Fix the missed parameter
initialization
On Fri, 2011-04-29 at 17:44 +0800, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com> wrote:
>
> > pubname_callback_param::found should be initialized to 0 in fastpath lookup.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>
> > ---
> > tools/perf/util/probe-finder.c | 1 +
> > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/probe-finder.c b/tools/perf/util/probe-finder.c
> > index a7c7145..3b9d0b8 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/util/probe-finder.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/probe-finder.c
> > @@ -1538,6 +1538,7 @@ static int find_probes(int fd, struct probe_finder *pf)
> > .file = pp->file,
> > .cu_die = &pf->cu_die,
> > .sp_die = &pf->sp_die,
> > + .found = 0,
>
> Hm, why is this a 'misc cleanup'? If this field is uninitialized (it does
I should call it 'misc cleanup and fix'.
> appear so) and we rely on the field then right now this is a bug and the fix
> should be pushed to perf/urgent.
Indeed.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists