[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BANLkTina+YuDgACZfDV8T_Lnipo50J6zVA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2011 00:15:01 +0900
From: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Johannes Weiner <jweiner@...hat.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/8] compaction: make isolate_lru_page with filter aware
Hi Hannes,
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 5:48 PM, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 01:25:19AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
>> In async mode, compaction doesn't migrate dirty or writeback pages.
>> So, it's meaningless to pick the page and re-add it to lru list.
>>
>> Of course, when we isolate the page in compaction, the page might
>> be dirty or writeback but when we try to migrate the page, the page
>> would be not dirty, writeback. So it could be migrated. But it's
>> very unlikely as isolate and migration cycle is much faster than
>> writeout.
>>
>> So, this patch helps cpu and prevent unnecessary LRU churning.
>>
>> Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
>> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
>> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
>> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
>> ---
>> mm/compaction.c | 2 +-
>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
>> index dea32e3..9f80b5a 100644
>> --- a/mm/compaction.c
>> +++ b/mm/compaction.c
>> @@ -335,7 +335,7 @@ static unsigned long isolate_migratepages(struct zone *zone,
>> }
>>
>> /* Try isolate the page */
>> - if (__isolate_lru_page(page, ISOLATE_BOTH, 0, 0, 0) != 0)
>> + if (__isolate_lru_page(page, ISOLATE_BOTH, 0, !cc->sync, 0) != 0)
>> continue;
>
> With the suggested flags argument from 1/8, this would look like:
>
> flags = ISOLATE_BOTH;
> if (!cc->sync)
> flags |= ISOLATE_CLEAN;
>
> ?
Yes. I will change it.
>
> Anyway, nice change indeed!
Thanks!
--
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists