[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1304090924-8197-8-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 17:28:26 +0200
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: mingo@...hat.com, yinghai@...nel.org, rientjes@...gle.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 07/25] x86-32, NUMA: use sparse_memory_present_with_active_regions()
Instead of calling memory_present() for each region from NUMA init,
call sparse_memory_present_with_active_regions() from paging_init()
similarly to x86-64.
For flat and numaq, this results in exactly the same memory_present()
calls. For srat, if there are multiple memory chunks for a node,
after this change, memory_present() will be called separately for each
chunk instead of being called once to encompass the whole range, which
doesn't cause any harm and actually is the better behavior.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/apic/numaq_32.c | 2 --
arch/x86/mm/init_32.c | 1 +
arch/x86/mm/numa_32.c | 1 -
arch/x86/mm/srat_32.c | 8 +-------
4 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/numaq_32.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/numaq_32.c
index 0aced70..41b8b29 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/numaq_32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/numaq_32.c
@@ -91,8 +91,6 @@ static inline void numaq_register_node(int node, struct sys_cfg_data *scd)
memblock_x86_register_active_regions(node, node_start_pfn[node],
node_end_pfn[node]);
-
- memory_present(node, node_start_pfn[node], node_end_pfn[node]);
}
/*
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/init_32.c b/arch/x86/mm/init_32.c
index 80088f9..2cde0a3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/init_32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/init_32.c
@@ -716,6 +716,7 @@ void __init paging_init(void)
* NOTE: at this point the bootmem allocator is fully available.
*/
olpc_dt_build_devicetree();
+ sparse_memory_present_with_active_regions(MAX_NUMNODES);
sparse_init();
zone_sizes_init();
}
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa_32.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa_32.c
index e0d9716..f847fa1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/numa_32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa_32.c
@@ -119,7 +119,6 @@ int __init get_memcfg_numa_flat(void)
node_start_pfn[0] = 0;
node_end_pfn[0] = max_pfn;
memblock_x86_register_active_regions(0, 0, max_pfn);
- memory_present(0, 0, max_pfn);
/* Indicate there is one node available. */
nodes_clear(node_online_map);
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/srat_32.c b/arch/x86/mm/srat_32.c
index ae20046..6b9bfd7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/srat_32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/srat_32.c
@@ -209,7 +209,7 @@ static __init int node_read_chunk(int nid, struct node_memory_chunk_s *memory_ch
int __init get_memcfg_from_srat(void)
{
- int i, j, nid;
+ int i, j;
if (srat_disabled())
goto out_fail;
@@ -273,12 +273,6 @@ int __init get_memcfg_from_srat(void)
/* for out of order entries in SRAT */
sort_node_map();
- for_each_online_node(nid) {
- unsigned long start = node_start_pfn[nid];
- unsigned long end = min(node_end_pfn[nid], max_pfn);
-
- memory_present(nid, start, end);
- }
return 1;
out_fail:
printk(KERN_DEBUG "failed to get NUMA memory information from SRAT"
--
1.7.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists